E: Elucidate the Hypothesis Elucidate the Hypothesis for Each Experiment

Every experiment in a paper is trying to answer a different part of the overarching research question. Let's figure out what the research question is and how it is being answered.

Abstract representation of overall research question.

Identify the Overall Research Question

On a separate sheet of paper or in the margins of the article, write down the overall research question(s) that the paper is trying to answer.

Here are a few tips:

  • The research question can often be found in or inferred from the introduction section.
  • The concept map you made in C can also provide clues about the research question.
  • Make sure the research question includes specific details.
Abstract representation of list of experiments with type of study.

Determine the Type of Study for Each Experiment

  1. Identify all the experiments in your paper: Looking at the figures, make a list of all the experiments that the researchers conducted. Most of the time, each figure presents one experiment. However, some figures present multiple experiments side-by-side.
  2. Write down whether each experiment presents a descriptive study, experimental test, or other type of study: A descriptive study looks at existing conditions or data and describes observations about that data. For example, researchers might first want to describe or identify all of the microbes in a healthy mouse gut, and them compare them to the microbes in the gut of a disease model mouse.
    An experimental test usually involves identifiable controls and experimental conditions that are specifically manipulated. For example, what happens to the microbial community when mice are given antibiotics (experimental) or no antibiotics (control)?
    It’s also possible that your figure doesn’t fit neatly into either of these categories. In this case, label it is “other” and use the Free Response template in the next step. Keep in mind that sometimes there isn’t a comparison involved, and the researchers are describing the results of an observation or exploratory or preliminary experiments.
Abstract representation of since, if, then statements.

Identify the Hypothesis for Each Experiment

Each experiment in the paper is an attempt to answer part of the research question.

On a separate sheet of paper or in the margins of the article, write a “Since, If, Then” statement for each experiment. A “Since, If, Then” statement is a way of formulating the hypothesis. It helps you discover…

  • why the researchers did the experiment
  • what question they were trying to answer
  • what they expected the outcome of the experiment to be

Here's how to do it:

  1. Since: Identify the observation or rationale that led the researchers to conduct this experiment. This can often be inferred from the introduction or beginning of the results section. Turn this into a phrase that begins with the word “since”, e.g. Since previous studies show that fungi have high cellulolytic activity….
  2. If: Identify the specific question or hypothesis that the researchers are trying to answer through this experiment. You can also think of this as the observation that the researchers are trying to explain. Turn it into a phrase that begins with “if”, e.g. if there is cellulolytic activity in leaf litter….
  3. Then: Predict the expected outcome of the experiment, and turn it into a phrase that begins with the word “then”, e.g. then most of cellulolytic potential (genes coding for cellulases) will be from fungi.

Some descriptive studies might not have clearly testable “If” statements because they may be exploratory. In those cases the "If, Then" part of the hypothesis may be more like the following:

  1. Since…
  2. If x and y are compared…
  3. Then we will observe…

What makes a successful "Since, If, Then" statement? Real student hypotheses

Example 1: Microbial Transfer Therapy

Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE there is a correlation between Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) severity and Gastrointestinal (GI) problems, and since GI symptoms can be attributed to dysbiotic gut microbiota,
IF Microbial Transfer Therapy (MTT) can effectively rebalance the microbiome and alleviate autism and GI symptoms,
THEN there will be a change in the composition of the gut microbiome and there will be improvements in GI and ASD severity.
Instructor Feedback
  • SINCE includes the rationale for the entire study.
  • IF is the big picture hypothesis.
  • THEN is the expected outcome for the whole study
Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE alterations to the gut microbiome can correct dysbiosis and rebalance the community,
IF MTT is effective in shifting the gut community in ASD children,
THEN there will be similar compositions between post-MTT microbial communities and donor communities.
Instructor Feedback
  • SINCE includes the rationale for this specific experiment.
  • IF is the idea being tested.
  • THEN is the observable expected result.
Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE the gut microbiome also includes viruses and SINCE the virome is dependent on the bacterial population,
IF MTT alters the bacterial population and composition,
THEN there will be a corresponding change in the virome composition after MTT treatment.
Instructor Feedback
  • The second hypothesis in SINCE ("the virome is dependent on the bacterial population") leads logically from the first hypothesis ("the gut microbiome also includes viruses").
Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE antibiotic treatment leads to temporary improvements in ASD-related and GI symptoms/severity,
IF MTT is effective in treating children with ASD and GI problems with lasting benefits,
THEN there will be long-term improvements in GI symptoms and autism severity.
Instructor Feedback
  • This hypothesis needs a bit of work.
  • It isn't clear how the SINCE rationale (antibiotic treatment) is related to MTT or the expected outcomes.
  • IF and THEN statements are circular ("if X is true, then X will be true"). This could be improved by changing the THEN to be more specific. What long-term changes would you expect to observe?

Example 2: Infant Gut Microbiota

Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE birth mode has a significant effect on the nascent neonatal gut microbiota,
IF we characterize the gut microbiota at different developmental time points,
THEN they will have significantly different compositions.
Instructor Feedback
  • Good hypothesis overall!
  • It's clear that this is a descriptive study.
  • The IF statement is describing the comparison being done, while THEN is the expected result of the comparison.
Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE metabolites are excreted through urine,
IF urine samples are taken as well as faecal samples,
THEN there will be metabolites present that mirror the microbiota composition.
Instructor Feedback
  • This is a descriptive study.
  • IF and THEN here could be improved to better describe what is actually being compared and the specific expected outcome.
Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE Caesarian section infants lack the natural inoculum of bacteria obtained through the birth canal,
IF urine samples are taken as well as faecal samples,
THEN there will be metabolites present that mirror the microbiota composition.
Instructor Feedback
  • This is an experimental study.
  • Good hypothesis overall, but…
  • IF could be improved: "IF bacteria can be transferred via breastfeeding, THEN…"
Since, If, Then Statement
SINCE Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are known natural inhabitants of the healthy infant microbiota,
IF we use culture-independent methods to isolate these two bacteria from each birth mode,
THEN we will be able to test for their presence over time.
Instructor Feedback
  • This is an experimental study.
  • This hypothesis could be improved.
  • IF and THEN are both describing the method used in the experiment, not the scientific question being tested and expected outcome.

More Examples

See below for some E examples created by two different students for the same scientific article (linked for your reference).

Moon et al. 2020

Analysis example
Analysis example

Tsao et al. 2018

Analysis example
Analysis example

Wang et al. 2019

Analysis example
Analysis example

Wright et al. 2019

Analysis example
Analysis example

Yuan et al. 2019

Analysis example
Analysis example

Give it a try!

Tips & Strategies

  • When identifying the hypothesis for each experiment, it's helpful to think back to the experimental results you identified in R. If this was your experiment, what hypothesis would you be testing?
  • "If" and "Then" are often mixed up. Think of it in the following way, "If x is true, then I will observe y."
  • "Since" is based on a more widely accepted rationale or a previous finding, while "If" is specific to the researchers' experiment.
  • Be careful when making your list of experiments. Some papers have multiple experiments in one figure, while others have multiple figures that are about the same experiment.
  • Take care that the "If, Then" statement isn't circular. For example: "If x is true, then x will be true."

Ready?

Now you are ready to elucidate the hypothesis! When you finish, use this checklist to double-check your work:

Write down the overall research question
Write a "Since, If, Then" statement for each experiment